MICROBIOLOGY IN CHRONIC WOUNDS

Julija Mitrova Telenta

Julija Mitrova Telenta University Clinic of Dermatovenerology, Faculty of Medicine Ss.”Cyril and Methodious” University in Skopje, North Macedonia

Abstract

Chronic leg wounds are colonized by diverse microbial communities, including resident and transient flora, which significantly influence healing outcomes. Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are frequently implicated, with polymicrobial infections contributing to delayed healing and antimicrobial resistance. Aim: To investigate the microbiological agents in chronic leg wounds. Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted at the University Clinic for Dermatovenerology and the Institute of Microbiology and Parasitology, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, following ethics approval and written informed consent. One hundred adult patients with chronic wounds localized on the lower extremities (>4 weeks duration, >1 cm²) were included. Exclusion criteria encompassed malignancy, inflammatory dermatoses, burns, recent antibiotic therapy, and acute infections. Clinical evaluation, patient questionnaires, and wound swab samples were collected for microbial isolation and identification. Results: Among 106 chronic wounds, microbial growth was observed in 67 samples. Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA 35.8%, MRSA 7.5%) was the most frequently isolated pathogen, followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (19.4%), Enterobacter spp. (19.4%), and Escherichia coli (17.9%). Polymicrobial infections were detected in 29.8% of cases, with MSSA combined with P. aeruginosa or Enterobacter species being the most common associations. Conclusion: Chronic leg wounds are frequently colonized by a heterogeneous mix of microorganisms, with S. aureus and P. aeruginosa predominating. Polymicrobial infections pose challenges for treatment and may influence healing outcomes. Comprehensive microbiological evaluation is essential for guiding targeted antimicrobial therapy.

Keywords: Chronic wounds; microbiology.

References

1. Lejeune P. Contamination of abiotic surfaces: What a colonizing bacterium sees and how to blur it. Trends Microbiol. 2003;11(4):179–184.
2. Rendueles O, Ghigo JM. Multi-species biofilms: How to avoid unfriendly neighbors. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012;36(5):972–989.
3. Kong KF, Vuong C, Otto M. Staphylococcus quorum sensing in biofilm formation and infection. Int J Med Microbiol. 2006;296(2–3):133–139.
4. White C, Sharman AK, Gadd GM. An integrated microbial process for the bioremediation of soil contaminated with toxic metals. Nat Biotechnol. 1998;16(6):572–575.
5. Wilking JN, Zaburdaev V, De Volder M, Losick R, Brenner MP, Weitz DA. Liquid transport facilitated by channels in Bacillus subtilis biofilms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(3):848–852.
6. Olsson M, Järbrink K, Divakar U, Bajpai R, Upton Z, Schmidtchen A, et al. The humanistic and economic burden of chronic wounds: A systematic review. Wound Repair Regen. 2019;27(1):114–125.
7. Wolcott RD, Hanson JD, Rees EJ, Koenig LD, Phillips CD, Wolcott RA, et al. Analysis of the chronic wound microbiota of 2,963 patients by 16S rDNA pyrosequencing. Wound Repair Regen. 2016;24(1):163–174.
8. Kalan LR, Meisel JS, Loesche MA, Horwinski J, Soaita I, Chen X, et al. Strain- and species-level variation in the microbiome of diabetic wounds is associated with clinical outcomes and therapeutic efficacy. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;25(5):641–655.e5.
9. Loesche M, Gardner SE, Kalan L, Horwinski J, Zheng Q, Hodkinson BP, et al. Temporal stability in chronic wound microbiota is associated with poor healing. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137(1):237–244.
10. Verbanic S, Shen Y, Lee J, Deacon J, Chen I. Microbial predictors of healing and short-term effect of debridement on the microbiome of chronic wounds. Biofilms Microbiomes. 2020;6:21.
11. Reisner BS, Woods GL, Jr RB, Larone DH, Garcia LS, Shimiz R. General issues in clinical microbiology: General processing. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 1999:64–104.
12. Bessa LJ, Fazii P, Di Giulio M, Cellini L. Bacterial isolates from infected wounds and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern: Some remarks about wound infection. Int Wound J. 2015;12(1):47–52.
13. Jockenhöfer F, Gollnick H, Herberger K, Isbary G, Renner R, Stücker M, et al. Bacteriological pathogen spectrum of chronic leg ulcers: Results of a multicenter trial in dermatologic wound care centers differentiated by regions. JDDG. 2013;11(11):1057–1063. doi:10.1111/ddg.12170
14. Ahmed EF, Rasmi AH, Darwish AA, et al. Prevalence and resistance profile of bacteria isolated from wound infections among a group of patients in upper Egypt: A descriptive cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2023;16:106. doi:10.1186/s13104-023-06379-y
15. Hassan MA, Abd El-Aziz S, Elbadry HM, Samy A, Tamer TM. Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance profile, and characterization of multi-drug resistant bacteria from various infected wounds in North Egypt. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2022.
16. Asres G, Legese M, Woldearegay G. Prevalence of multidrug resistant bacteria in postoperative wound infections at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Arch Med. 2017;9(4):12.
17. Puca V, Marulli RZ, Grande R, Vitale I, Niro A, Molinaro G, et al. Microbial species isolated from infected wounds and antimicrobial resistance analysis: Data emerging from a three-years retrospective study. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021;10(10):1162. doi:10.3390/antibiotics10101162. PMID: 34680743. PMCID: PMC8532735.
18. Howell-Jones RS, Wilson MJ, Hill KE, Howard AJ, Price PE, Thomas DW. A review of the microbiology, antibiotic usage and resistance in chronic skin wounds. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;55:143–149. doi:10.1093/jac/dkh513
19. Richard JL, Sotto A, Jourdan N, et al. Risk factors and healing impact of multidrug-resistant bacteria in diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Metab. 2008;34(4 Pt 1):363–369.
20. Hartemann-Heurtier A, Robert J, Jacqueminet S, et al. Diabetic foot ulcer and multidrug-resistant organisms: Risk factors and impact. Diabet Med. 2004;21(7):710–715.
21. World Health Organization. Antimicrobial resistance: Global report on surveillance. 2014. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/112642
. Accessed January 15, 2023.
22. Phan S, Feng CH, Huang R, Lee ZX, Moua Y, Phung OJ, Lenhard JR. Relative abundance and detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from chronic wound infections globally. Microorganisms. 2023;11(5):1210. doi:10.3390/microorganisms11051210