SHORT REVIEW OF DIRECT ANTERIOR APPROACH VS. LATERAL APPROACH IN TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY - ONE MONTH AFTER SURGERY
Abstract
The direct anterior approach (DAA) is gaining use in total hip arthroplasty (THA), while the lateral approach (LA) remains standard. This study compared operative time, blood loss, implant positioning, and early complications in 200 patients (100 DAA, 100 LA). All procedures used cementless implants and tranexamic acid. Mean operative time was longer with DAA (87 vs. 76 minutes), but blood loss and transfusion rates were lower. Radiographs showed similar acetabular positioning; however, varus stem alignment and trochanteric fractures occurred more often with DAA. Early complications included one infection in DAA and three infections plus one dislocation in LA. At one month, Harris Hip Scores favored DAA (94 vs. 81). DAA facilitates faster recovery but requires careful technique and patient selection.
Keywords: direct anterior approach, lateral approach, total hip arthroplasty, postoperative X-ray, rehabilitation.
References
2.Post ZD, Orozco F, Diaz-Ledezma C, Hozack WJ, Ong A. Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty:indications,technique, and results. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014 Sep:22(9):595-603.
3.Peters RM, Ten Have BLEF, Rykov K, VanSteenbergen L, Putter H, Rutgers M, Vos S, Van Steljnen B, Poolman RW, Vehmejler SBW, Ziljstra WP, The learning curve of the direct anterior approach is 100 cases:an analysis based on 15,875 total hip arthroplasties in the Dutch Arhtroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2022 Sep 27; 93:775-82.
4.Melman WP, Mollen BP, Kollen BJ, Verheyen CC. First experiences with the direct anterior approach in lateral decubitus position:learnin curve and 1 year complication rate. Hip Int. 2015 May-Jun;25(3):251-7.
5.Harford JM, Bellino MJ. The learning curve for the direct anterior approach for total hip aethroplasty: a single surgeons first 500 cases. Hip Int.2017 Sep 19;27(5):483-8.
6.Foissey C, Keney R, Luceri F, Servien E, Lustig S, Batailler C, Greater trochanter fractures in the direct anterior approach: evolution during learnin curve, risk factors and consequences. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg.2021 Apr 141(4):675-81.
7.Dall`Oca C, Ceccato A, Cresceri M, Scaglia M, Guglielmini M, Pellizzari G, Valentini R, Magnan B. Facing complications of direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty during the learning curve. Acta Biomed. 2020 May 30;91(4-S):103-9.
8.Bendich I, Landy DC, Do H, Krell E, Diane A, Boettner F, Rodriguez J, Alexiades M, Gonzales Della Valle A. Intraoperative complications and early return to the operating room in total hip arthroplasty performed through the direct anterior et posterior approaches. An institutional experience of surgeons after their learning curve. J Arthroplasty. 2021 Aug;36(8):2829-35.
9.Gulbrandsen TR, Muffly SA, Shamrock A, O`Reilly O, Bedard NA, Otero JE, Brown TS. Total hip arthroplasty: direct anterior approach versus posterior approach in the first year of practice. Iowa Orthop J. 2022 Jun;42(1):127-36.
10.Gabariano L, Gold P, Sodhi N, Iturriaga C, Mont MA, Boraiah S. oes structured postgraduate training affect the learnin curve in direct anterior total hip arthroplasty? A single surgeon`s first 200 cases. Arthroplast Today. 2021 Jan 12;7:98-104.
11.Abdel MP, Watss CD, Houdek MT, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ, Epidemiology od periprosthetic fractures of the femur in 32644 primary total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience. Bone Joint J. 2016 Apr;98-B:461-7.
12.Sershon RA, McDonald Jf 3rd, Ho M Hamilton WG. Periprosthetis femur fracture risk: Influenced by stem choice, not surgical approach. J Arthroplasty.2021 Jul; 36(7s):363-6.
13.Haynes JA, Hopper RH, Jr, Parks NL, Hamilton WG. Direct anterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasty lowers the risk of dislocation compared to the posterior approach: a single institution experience. J. Arthroplasty.2022 Mar;37(3):495-500.