CORRELATION BETWEEN ROOT COMPLEX MORPHOLOGY AND SURGICAL EXTRACTION OF MANDIBULAR THIRD MOLARS
Abstract
Introduction: An impacted tooth is a tooth that has not erupted in the oral cavity, that is, its eruption is prevented for some reason. These are teeth that, throughout their development and under the influence of biological, dynamic and mechanical factors of genetic and phylogenetic origin, show variations in their number, size and degree of development. Material and methods: This paper included 80 patients who were divided into 2 groups of 40 patients each according to the degree of impaction and analyzed how the morphology of the root complex is affected by the surgical technique used during extraction. Results: The results show that the easiest surgical intervention is when the morphology of the root complex is a single conical root or the roots are joined in a conical shape, or even distally bent, because it is not necessary to separate them to extract the impacted tooth in its entirety and at the same time the possibility of apical fracture is avoided. Conclusion: The oral surgical procedure for extraction of impacted mandibular molars is not correlated with the morphology of the root complex but rather depends on the experience of the surgeon.
Key words: impacted mandibular third molar, root complex morphology, operative surgical procedures, flap, separation.
References
Gupta S, Marwah N. Impacted supernumerary teeth early or delayed intervention decision making dilemma. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012;5(3):226-230. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1173
Alshammari AK, Madfa AA. Surgical and orthodontic management of multiple supernumerary teeth associated with impacted permanent teeth a case report. Open Dent J. 2023. doi:10.2174/0118742106259288230922095833
Lanza Galvao E, Maria da Silveira E, Silveira de Oliveira E et al. Association between mandibular third molar position and occurrence of pericoronitis a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Oral Biol. 2019;107:104486. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2019.104486
Shirzadeh A, Bagheri Shirvan S, Alizadeh O et al. Most prevalent type of third molar impaction in patients with pericoronitis. WJPS. 2023;12(2):57-63. doi:10.61186/wjps.12.2.57
Gadhia A, Pepper T. Oral surgery extraction of teeth. StatPearls. Treasure Island FL StatPearls Publishing; 2025.
Choi JF, Park DY, Scruggs Williams SL, Chang P. Oral surgery extraction of unerupted teeth. StatPearls. Treasure Island FL StatPearls Publishing; 2025.
Ogden GR, Bissias E, Ruta DA, Ogston S. Quality of life following third molar removal a patient versus professional perspective. Br Dent J. 1998;185:407-410.
Sandhu A, Sandhu S, Kanz T. Comparison of two different flap designs in surgical removal of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39:1091-1095.
Jose M, Sanchis Bielsa J, Hernandez Bazan S, Penarrocha Diego M. Flap repositioning versus conventional suturing in third molar surgery. 2008;13(2):E138-142.
Chang HH, Lee JJ, Kok SH et al. Periodontal healing after mandibular third molar surgery comparison of distolingual alveolectomy and tooth division techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;33(1):32-37.
Gupta S, Khan TA, Attarde H, Narula J. Surgical anatomy of mandibular third molar. Austin J Surg. 2019;6(13):1194.