THE PREDICTIVE ROLE OF SELECTIVE LABORATORY PARAMETERS FOR THE OCCURRENCE OF “UNWANTED EVENTS” IN ADULTS WITH LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY

  • Ilija Milev Department of Surgery, Clinical Hospital-Shtip, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Goce Delchev University in Shtip, R.North Macedonia
  • Vesna Velikj Stefanovska Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, R. North Macedonia
  • Aleksandar Mitevski Department of Surgery, Re-Medica General Hospital, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Goce Delchev University in Shtip, R. North Macedonia
  • Panche Karagjozov Clinic for Digestive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, R. North Macedonia
  • Marjan Mihailov Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Hospital-Shtip, R. North Macedonia

Abstract

The aim of our study was to assess the potential predictive role of selected laboratory parameters in recognition of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) associated with unwanted events defined as intraoperative difficulties, conversion to open approach and early postoperative complications.  A multicenter, prospective, clinical study was conducted. 75 randomly selected adults with acute appendicitis were selected as study participants. Twenty-five laboratory parameters were measured for all of them. In 69, LA was performed and in 6 of the patients, a conversion to open appendectomy had to be accomplished. For each patient, we registered the unwanted events in relation to the treatment. Out of 75 participants with LA, 51 (68%) were without and 24 (32%) were with unwanted events. Binary analysis showed significantly higher levels of total bilirubin (p = 0.0228), sodium (p = 0.0161) and C – reactive protein (p = 0.0005) in the group with unwanted events. Multiple logistic regression analysis confirmed the total serum bilirubin as the only independent predictor – OR = 1.079 [p = 0.041, 95% CI = 1.003-1.162]. High levels of C – reactive protein, serum sodium and total serum bilirubin could be indicators of unwanted intraoperative or postoperative course in the patients treated with LA. In such cases it is wise to consider performing the laparoscopic exploration in the presence of an experienced surgeon.


Keywords: laparoscopic appendectomy, C- reactive protein, bilirubin, sodium.


https://doi.org/10.55302/JMS2251064m

References

1. McBurney C. The incision made in the abdominal wall in cases of appendicitis, with a description of a new method of operating. Ann Surg. 1894 Jul; 20 (1): 38–43.
2. Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy. 1983 Mar; 15(2):59-64.
3. Jaschinski T, Mosch CG, Eikermann M, Neugebauer EA, Sauerland S. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 28;11(11):CD001546.
4. Dasari BV, Baker J, Markar S, Gardiner K. Laparoscopic appendicectomy in obese is associated with improvements in clinical outcome: systematic review. Int J Surg. 2015 Jan;13:250-6.
5. Popa D, Soltes M, Uranues S, Fingerhut A. Are there specific indications for laparoscopic appendectomy? A review and critical appraisal of the literature. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Nov;25(11):897-902.
6. Horvath P, Lange J, Bachmann R, Struller F, Konigsrainer A, Zdichavsky M. Comparison of clinical outcome of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):199-205.
7. Korndorffer JR Jr, Fellinger E, Reed W. SAGES guideline for laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc. 2010 Apr;24(4):757-61.
8. Gorter RR, Eker HH, Gorter-Stam MA, Abis GS, Acharya A, Ankersmit M at al. Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015. Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4668-4690.
9. Di Saverio S, Podda M, De Simone B, Ceresoli M, Augustin G, Gori A at al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr 15;15(1):27.
10. van Rossem CC, Bolmers MD, Schreinemacher MH, van Geloven AA, Bemelman WA; Snapshot Appendicitis Collaborative Study Group. Prospective nationwide outcome audit of surgery for suspected acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2016 Jan;103(1):144-51.
11. Sporn E, Petroski GF, Mancini GJ, Astudillo JA, Miedema BW, Thaler K. Laparoscopic appendectomy--is it worth the cost? Trend analysis in the US from 2000 to 2005. J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Feb;208(2):179-85.
12. Andersson RE. Short-term complications and long-term morbidity of laparoscopic and open appendicectomy in a national cohort. Br J Surg. 2014 Aug;101(9):1135-42.
13. Milev I, Velikj Stefanovska V, Karagjozov P, Mancheva Lj, Zendelska R. Utilization of laparoscopic appendectomy – a three-year experience. Physioacta JMAPA, 2018;12(1):47-57.
14. Goel A, Bansal A, Baliyan A. Preoperative predictive factors for difficult laparoscopic appendectomy. Int Surg J. 2017 Oct;4(10):3488-91.
15. Shelton JA, Brown JJ, Young JA. Preoperative C-reactive protein predicts the severity and likelihood of complications following appendicectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014 Jul;96(5):369-72.
16. Abe T, Nagaie T, Miyazaki M, Ochi M, Fukuya T, Kajiyama K. Risk factors of converting to laparotomy in laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul 4;6:109-14.
17. Andert A, Alizai HP, Klink CD, Neitzke N, Fitzner C, Heidenhain C, Kroh A, Neumann UP, Binnebosel M. Risk factors for morbidity after appendectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Sep;402(6):987-93.
18. Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Enochsson L, Gudbjartsson T, Wenner J, Kullman E, Fenyo G, Ringqvist I, Sörensen S. Conversion from laparoscopic to open appendicectomy: a possible drawback of the laparoscopic technique?. Eur J Surg. 2001 Mar;167(3):209-13.
19. Giesen LJ, van den Boom AL, van Rossem CC, den Hoed PT, Wijnhoven BP. Retrospective multicenter study on risk factors for surgical Site infections after appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Dig Surg. 2017;34(2):103-107.
20. Estrada JJ, Petrosyan M, Barnhart J, Tao M, Sohn H, Towfigh S, Mason RJ. Hyperbilirubinemia in appendicitis: a new predictor of perforation. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Jun;11(6):714-8
21. Khan S. Elevated serum bilirubin in acute appendicitis:a new diagnostic tool. Kathmandu University Med. J.2008;6(2):161-5.
22. Sand M, Bechara FG, Holland-Letz T, Sand D, Mehnert G, Mann B. Diagnostic value of hyperbilirubinemia as a predictive factor for appendiceal perforation in acute appendicitis. Am J Surg. 2009 Aug;198(2):193-8
23. Burcharth J, Pommergaard HC, Rosenberg J, Gogenur I. Hyperbilirubinemia as a predictor for appendiceal per foration: a systematic review. Scand J Surg. 2013;102(2):55-60.
24. Guy S, Wysocki P. Risk factors for intra-abdominal abscess post laparoscopic appendicectomy for gangrenous or perforated appendicitis: A retrospective cohort study. International Journal of Surgery 2018;10:47-54.
Published
2022-05-04
How to Cite
MILEV, Ilija et al. THE PREDICTIVE ROLE OF SELECTIVE LABORATORY PARAMETERS FOR THE OCCURRENCE OF “UNWANTED EVENTS” IN ADULTS WITH LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY. Journal of Morphological Sciences, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. 64-74, may 2022. ISSN 2545-4706. Available at: <http://www.jms.mk/jms/article/view/vol5no1-9>. Date accessed: 26 june 2022.
Section
Articles